<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McDonnell on speed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/</link>
	<description>blogging our way to democratic wins in virginia beach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ocean bleu</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>ocean bleu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 13:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-969</guid>
		<description>Your zeal is correct, but your number on fatalities is wrong. I wrote a letter to the editor of the Pilot and did the math- the fatalities would be &quot;just&quot; 2-3 more people each year.  Having said that, I ended my letter to the Pilot with the sentence, &quot;Let&#039;s hope it&#039;s no one you or I know.&quot;  They edited out that line.  *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your zeal is correct, but your number on fatalities is wrong. I wrote a letter to the editor of the Pilot and did the math- the fatalities would be &#8220;just&#8221; 2-3 more people each year.  Having said that, I ended my letter to the Pilot with the sentence, &#8220;Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s no one you or I know.&#8221;  They edited out that line.  *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cargosquid</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Cargosquid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Who is driving below 70mph on the highway now?  The speed limit is moot.  I drive 65-70 now and get passed by 80% of the traffic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who is driving below 70mph on the highway now?  The speed limit is moot.  I drive 65-70 now and get passed by 80% of the traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-735</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-735</guid>
		<description>i want the 70 mph speed limit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want the 70 mph speed limit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>While I know I am unusual, I think I can point out how increasing the speed limit could actually increase fuel economy.  First off, I presently possess a truck that is ungoverned, I might be able to claim I finally have a triple digit truck if I am willing to take my engine just a hair over rated RPM.

With all of that, I am not a speed demon truck driver.  More often then not I travel well below the posted speed on upgrades and level ground to increase my fuel mileage, but on downhill stretches I try to gain as much speed as possible so that when I get to the bottom of the grade I can coast for as long as possible without putting fuel to the engine.  I am highly motivated to get high mileage out of my truck because the higher the fuel mileage, the higher the profit margin.

With a 70 MPH speed limit I can allow my truck to coast further once I get to the bottom of the grade then I could when the speed limit is lower.  I love it when I get into states where the speed limit is 75 MPH, I never have to worry about getting a ticket as I am coasting downhill trying to maximize my fuel mileage.

I especially hate it when I get to states (like California) where the speed limit for trucks is ALREADY 55 MPH and state troopers like to sit at the bottom of hills giving speeding tickets to any truck driver who dares to allow gravity to help him/her increase fuel economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I know I am unusual, I think I can point out how increasing the speed limit could actually increase fuel economy.  First off, I presently possess a truck that is ungoverned, I might be able to claim I finally have a triple digit truck if I am willing to take my engine just a hair over rated RPM.</p>
<p>With all of that, I am not a speed demon truck driver.  More often then not I travel well below the posted speed on upgrades and level ground to increase my fuel mileage, but on downhill stretches I try to gain as much speed as possible so that when I get to the bottom of the grade I can coast for as long as possible without putting fuel to the engine.  I am highly motivated to get high mileage out of my truck because the higher the fuel mileage, the higher the profit margin.</p>
<p>With a 70 MPH speed limit I can allow my truck to coast further once I get to the bottom of the grade then I could when the speed limit is lower.  I love it when I get into states where the speed limit is 75 MPH, I never have to worry about getting a ticket as I am coasting downhill trying to maximize my fuel mileage.</p>
<p>I especially hate it when I get to states (like California) where the speed limit for trucks is ALREADY 55 MPH and state troopers like to sit at the bottom of hills giving speeding tickets to any truck driver who dares to allow gravity to help him/her increase fuel economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Campbell</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>David Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really think health care reform can be blamed for our transportation woes.

The highway speed limit is already 65 MPH in most rural areas of Virginia and 70 MPH on one part of I-85.  Raising the speed limit won&#039;t solve anything, but it does cause additional problems.

Simply raising the gas tax would fund transportation improvements, encourage conservation, and capture user fees from out-of-state travelers, all without adding any new infrastructure costs for collection (unlike tolls).  Of course, that will never happen under Gov. McDonnell and other Republicans in the General Assembly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really think health care reform can be blamed for our transportation woes.</p>
<p>The highway speed limit is already 65 MPH in most rural areas of Virginia and 70 MPH on one part of I-85.  Raising the speed limit won&#8217;t solve anything, but it does cause additional problems.</p>
<p>Simply raising the gas tax would fund transportation improvements, encourage conservation, and capture user fees from out-of-state travelers, all without adding any new infrastructure costs for collection (unlike tolls).  Of course, that will never happen under Gov. McDonnell and other Republicans in the General Assembly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Tyler Ballance</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Tyler Ballance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-544</guid>
		<description>&quot;...citing studies that...&quot;

As I recall it was one study and it did not look at specific locations but tried to average all locations, creating a &quot;one size fits all&quot; approach. 

In rural areas, increasing the speed limit is feasible, but we should examine each case independently, as has been done here in Virginia.

We could conserve a great deal of fuel if we all drove slow, or just stayed home, but our economy would quickly collapse. If we want to get America back on the road to prosperity, we need to find ways to physically move goods quickly and economically.

With the advent of fuel cell technology, and smart roads, we may soon find it quite ludicrous that we used to travel at a mere 70 mph, as we zip along at speeds in excess of 200 mph and getting the equivalent of 150 mpg. The technology exist right now, but our representatives seem to be fixated on health care rather than building our national infrastructure to support manufacturing and transportation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;citing studies that&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>As I recall it was one study and it did not look at specific locations but tried to average all locations, creating a &#8220;one size fits all&#8221; approach. </p>
<p>In rural areas, increasing the speed limit is feasible, but we should examine each case independently, as has been done here in Virginia.</p>
<p>We could conserve a great deal of fuel if we all drove slow, or just stayed home, but our economy would quickly collapse. If we want to get America back on the road to prosperity, we need to find ways to physically move goods quickly and economically.</p>
<p>With the advent of fuel cell technology, and smart roads, we may soon find it quite ludicrous that we used to travel at a mere 70 mph, as we zip along at speeds in excess of 200 mph and getting the equivalent of 150 mpg. The technology exist right now, but our representatives seem to be fixated on health care rather than building our national infrastructure to support manufacturing and transportation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bailey</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>If this nation really wanted to address the issue of speed, fuel abuse and life safety, they would stop building cars that reach speeds of 120 plus.  If we truely wanted the issue addressed, the vehicles could be built to limit speed to 70mph.  Not a matter of &quot;freedom&quot; being taken away but it saves money on public safety, medical injuries, car insurance rates and fuel costs nationwide.  But we play games instead...

Otherwise we only play politics and lip service to the issue that kils more Americans every year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this nation really wanted to address the issue of speed, fuel abuse and life safety, they would stop building cars that reach speeds of 120 plus.  If we truely wanted the issue addressed, the vehicles could be built to limit speed to 70mph.  Not a matter of &#8220;freedom&#8221; being taken away but it saves money on public safety, medical injuries, car insurance rates and fuel costs nationwide.  But we play games instead&#8230;</p>
<p>Otherwise we only play politics and lip service to the issue that kils more Americans every year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Campbell</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>David Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 17:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-518</guid>
		<description>As I posted &lt;a href=&quot;http://vbdems.org/2010/01/lose-the-battle-win-the-war/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;earlier&lt;/a&gt;: for every step Virginia takes backwards, the federal government is taking two steps forward.

When President Bush regulated smog, he ignored the recommendations of his own EPA scientists, resulting in a lawsuit by the American Lung Association.  The cost of implementing better smog controls will be paid many times over by the savings in health costs as well as saving thousands of lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I posted <a href="http://vbdems.org/2010/01/lose-the-battle-win-the-war/" rel="nofollow">earlier</a>: for every step Virginia takes backwards, the federal government is taking two steps forward.</p>
<p>When President Bush regulated smog, he ignored the recommendations of his own EPA scientists, resulting in a lawsuit by the American Lung Association.  The cost of implementing better smog controls will be paid many times over by the savings in health costs as well as saving thousands of lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen Levandoski</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-516</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen Levandoski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-516</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, David, but that image you&#039;re using makes me wanna remind folks about next week&#039;s EPA hearing in Arlington on toughening our smog standards!

From virginia.sierraclub.org:

On January 6, 2010, the EPA proposed to strengthen the national air quality standards for ozone. EPA proposed a range of 60-70 parts per billion (ppb), a much lower level than the current standard of 75 ppb.

“EPA is stepping up to protect Americans from one of the most persistent and widespread pollutants we face. Smog in the air we breathe poses a very serious health threat, especially to children and individuals suffering from asthma and lung disease. It dirties our air, clouds our cities, and drives up our health care costs across the country,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Using the best science to strengthen these standards is a long overdue action that will help millions of Americans breathe easier and live healthier.”

The EPA will be holding a public hearing in several places across the U.S. including Arlington, Virginia on Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2010, Hyatt Regency Crystal City at Reagan National Airport, Washington Room (located on the Ballroom Level), 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway in Arlington. The hearing begins at 9:30am and continues all day, into the evening.

Sign up to speak by email to crabtree.tricia@epa.gov or by telephone: (919) 541-5688. You’ll be allotted 5 minutes to speak. You can also sign up to speak here and get talking points for your remarks at SierraClub.org/BigPicture.

If you are interested in joining carpools of Virginians leaving from various points across the Commonwealth, contact Kate Pollard at kate.pollard@sierraclub.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, David, but that image you&#8217;re using makes me wanna remind folks about next week&#8217;s EPA hearing in Arlington on toughening our smog standards!</p>
<p>From virginia.sierraclub.org:</p>
<p>On January 6, 2010, the EPA proposed to strengthen the national air quality standards for ozone. EPA proposed a range of 60-70 parts per billion (ppb), a much lower level than the current standard of 75 ppb.</p>
<p>“EPA is stepping up to protect Americans from one of the most persistent and widespread pollutants we face. Smog in the air we breathe poses a very serious health threat, especially to children and individuals suffering from asthma and lung disease. It dirties our air, clouds our cities, and drives up our health care costs across the country,” said EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson. “Using the best science to strengthen these standards is a long overdue action that will help millions of Americans breathe easier and live healthier.”</p>
<p>The EPA will be holding a public hearing in several places across the U.S. including Arlington, Virginia on Tuesday, Feb. 2, 2010, Hyatt Regency Crystal City at Reagan National Airport, Washington Room (located on the Ballroom Level), 2799 Jefferson Davis Highway in Arlington. The hearing begins at 9:30am and continues all day, into the evening.</p>
<p>Sign up to speak by email to <a href="mailto:crabtree.tricia@epa.gov">crabtree.tricia@epa.gov</a> or by telephone: (919) 541-5688. You’ll be allotted 5 minutes to speak. You can also sign up to speak here and get talking points for your remarks at SierraClub.org/BigPicture.</p>
<p>If you are interested in joining carpools of Virginians leaving from various points across the Commonwealth, contact Kate Pollard at <a href="mailto:kate.pollard@sierraclub.org">kate.pollard@sierraclub.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weintraub</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weintraub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2010/01/mcdonnell-proposes-speed/#comment-514</guid>
		<description>The Virginia Republican plan for governance: &quot;They&#039;re taking away our freedumz.&quot;

Yeah, that should cover everything.

&lt;3 Love the new header image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Virginia Republican plan for governance: &#8220;They&#8217;re taking away our freedumz.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, that should cover everything.</p>
<p>&lt;3 Love the new header image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
