Nye’s “Principles for Health Care Reform”
(Note: I moved this post back to the top of the page because the crucial House vote is likely to happen by the end of this week.)
More than a year ago, Rep. Glenn Nye established his “Principles for Health Care Reform.”
In violation of his own principles, Rep. Nye voted against the House bill.
Soon he will have another chance to stand up for his principles. Democrats are urging him to vote in favor of a bill that already passed the Senate by a 60% supermajority, along with a budget reconciliation bill to amend it.
UPDATE: An unofficial whip counts lists Rep. Nye as “leaning no.”
The Senate bill already meets or exceeds all 7 of Rep. Nye’s principles:
“PRESERVE CHOICE: If you like your doctor and your health insurance, you keep them – no questions asked. I authored a Congressional Resolution guaranteeing the right of Americans to choose their own doctors, and I will only support a reform plan that protects your choice of doctor, health insurance and treatment.”
The Senate bill keeps in place the current employer-provided private insurance market and does not affect the individual’s choice of doctor or treatment in any way. For people in the individual insurance market, it will expand their choice of health insurance by increasing market competition in American Health Benefit Exchanges.
“EASE THE BURDEN ON SMALL BUSINESSES: We need to ease the burden on small businesses by stopping the spiraling increase in costs. Rising health care costs are crippling small businesses and holding back our economic recovery, and we must ensure that health care reform helps small businesses and allows them to create jobs.”
Small businesses (less than 50 employees) are exempt from the employer mandate. Small businesses (less than 25 employees) will be provided a tax credit to allow them to afford providing health insurance to their employees. Small businesses would be able to choose health insurance from competitive Small Business Health Options Program Exchanges.
“FISCAL DISCIPLINE: Health care reform must be paid for, and we must not pass the bill to future generations. After years of reckless deficit spending, it would be irresponsible to enact health care reform without paying for it. We have to control the cost of health care in order to return to fiscal sustainability.”
The CBO estimates the Senate bill will actually reduce the deficit by $132 billion over the first 10 years and by $650 billion over the next 10 years (The final budget reconciliation version hasn’t been scored by the CBO yet, but the reconciliation rules require even more deficit reduction.)
“ACCESS AND AFFORDABILITY: All Americans should have access to quality, affordable health care – regardless of preexisting conditions. If you lose your job, change jobs, or decide to start your own business, you shouldn’t have to worry about losing your health care coverage. We also need to stop bureaucrats from telling doctors what treatments are allowed or what illnesses can be covered. Medical decisions should be made by patients and doctors, and no one else.”
The Senate bill will expand access to 31 million Americans who are currently uninsured (12.4% of the 2nd district). It will end discrimination by eliminating exclusions for preexisting conditions and lifetime maximum benefits. Insurance company bureaucrats will be prohibited from denying coverage because of a person’s medical condition, charging higher premiums because of a person’s sex or health status, or rescinding coverage when a person became sick or disabled.
“HEALTH CARE; NOT SICK CARE: Preventive medicine saves lives and reduces costs. Health care reform should ensure that Americans have access to preventive screening and care before they get sick. We must reduce costs by cracking down on waste, fraud and abuse, and by reforming the system to promote better outcomes instead of simply more procedures.”
The Senate bill mandates 100% coverage of preventive care. It provides enhanced enforcement of fraud and abuse. It supports comparative effectiveness research and establishes a national quality improvement strategy.
“PROTECT VETERANS’ BENEFITS: We must not fund health care reform on the backs of our veterans and their families. The health benefits earned by our veterans and servicemembers are an absolute guarantee. I will oppose any plan that reduces these benefits – or that increases costs for our military personnel or veterans – in order to pay for health care reform.”
The Senate bill does not affect veteran’s benefits.
“SUPPORT SENIORS AND MEDICARE: Medicare, and the senior citizens who depend upon it, must be protected. Health care reform should not come at the expense of cuts to Medicare benefits or reimbursements.”
The Senate bill cuts Medicare costs, not benefits received by senior citizens. For example, it cuts out middleman insurance companies who are currently skimming 14% from Medicare Advantage plans. The Senate bill actually enhances benefits by providing 100% coverage of preventive care and by shrinking the Medicare Part D “donut hole” for prescription drugs. (President Obama’s proposed revision will eliminate the “donut hole”completely.) It extends the solvency of Medicare by a decade. Health reform is enthusiastically supported by the AARP.
Health reform offers many other specific benefits for Virginia.
Join us on Facebook.
Follow us on Twitter.
March 5th, 2010 at 10:09 am
[...] are an absolute guarantee. I will oppose any plan that … View full post on health benefit – Google Blog Search [...]
March 6th, 2010 at 7:56 pm
“Nye” and “Principles” in the same sentence… That’s funny.
March 7th, 2010 at 2:50 pm
lets primary out glenn nye with a real liberal democrat! nye is no better than a tea party candidate!
March 8th, 2010 at 9:34 am
Let me make this prediction concerning the second district. If Health Care Reform fails to pass in this session; and, Representative Nye voted not to pass it; then, Representative Nye will return to Congress by a comfortable margin.
March 8th, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Wally Erb: I would like to hear your reasoning for making this prediction.
Last time, Nye beat Drake 52%-47% (with Obama and Warner on the ballot).
If Nye votes against health reform:
1) Will the Republican Party refrain from demonizing him as a “Pelosi liberal” in their attack ads?
2) Will Republicans vote for Nye instead of the Republican candidate?
3) Will Democrats reward Nye’s role in defeating health reform by enthusiastically contributing to his campaign, volunteering, and turning out to vote for him?
I don’t think so.
March 8th, 2010 at 5:02 pm
So what do you think will happen if he votes FOR health reform?
March 8th, 2010 at 6:19 pm
The GOP will attack Nye no matter what he does… I’d suggest he vote for the Health care reform package and stand tall and proud. If he votes no, I’ll not vote for him in November and will vote for nobody in the 2nd. He’ll need every vote to win in November but those votes are not coming from the republicans even if he votes against heath reform. That we can be sure of.
Nye can and should vote to change the health care system in our country. Even the GOP knows the system has to be changed but they are so busy playing party politices, they can’t do what is right for America. Nye can vote to do “what is right” and that is something that he can be proud of for the rest of his life.
March 8th, 2010 at 6:49 pm
So… what do you think will happen if he votes FOR health reform?
March 8th, 2010 at 10:15 pm
If you believe that a Republican can win based on the number of those who consider themselves Republican or them same for Democrats you are sadly mistaken. To be successful, the candidate who prevails must garner the independent/non-partisan vote. Right now, the only candidate that has a proven record/and has not been led by the nose by Pelosi is Representative Nye. As far as independents are concerned he has voted correctly on the major issues that concern them.
March 9th, 2010 at 4:31 pm
Listen carefully Wally: that’s the sound of one hand clapping. Or more accurately, the sound of one “independent” voting for Nye. Or not.
It doesn’t matter what these so-called “independents” do. If Nye doesn’t get some Democrats to vote for him, he’s toast.
March 10th, 2010 at 5:17 am
Spotter
Somehow you believe that Democrat is synonymous far left liberal which is far from the case in Virginia. I have to almost believe that of Virginian Democrats. it is a small fringe that oppose Nye’s representation. Any challenge to Nye’s nomination will easily be brushed aside. So now, Spotter, are you saying the party faithful will stay home or vote for someone the likes of an ultra-social conservative Rigell? If that’s the case my friend, you have hell of a dysfunctional unloyal political party.
March 11th, 2010 at 6:02 pm
Yeah, let the liberal left defeat Glenn Nye in the primary and then watch as the victor of the primary goes flaming down in defeat in the general election. Many, perhaps myself included, will not just stay at home but go to the polls voting for the other person.
Virginia broadly and Virginia Beach more specifically does not rise to the standard of voting in a liberal orgasm candidate. If it gets down to extremism, the extreme right is going to win over the extreme left in Virginia. Candidates somewhere in the center (like Glenn Nye) might emerge victorious.
If you think Glenn Nye is bad, take a look at the long line of Republicans lining up to run against him. They think even centrist Glenn Nye is vulnerable. What chance would your ultra liberal candidate stand against them?
My past vote was for Glenn Nye, my future vote will be his too. Glenn Nye is better then who he replaced and better then everyone lining up to run against him.
March 11th, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Little David: I agree with you. I don’t favor trying to primary Nye from the left, because it wouldn’t work. Nye is much better than any of the Republican candidates, and Democrats should support his reelection.
On the other hand, I can’t vote for him because I’m not in his district. Last time, I contributed to his campaign and I worked a poll in the district on election day for Obama, Warner, and Nye. Will I contribute and volunteer for someone who voted against the climate change bill and against health reform? Probably not.