<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for VB Dems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vbdems.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vbdems.org</link>
	<description>blogging our way to democratic wins in virginia beach</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:48:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Romney Team-Up? by LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2012/02/anti-romney-team-up/comment-page-1/#comment-15236</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2012/02/anti-romney-team-up/#comment-15236</guid>
		<description>Well, I strongly support open primaries.  Yes, they have some drawbacks, however I think the good far outweighs the bad.  It was only within the last few years that I decided I might as well announce party affiliation.  Up till then, I honestly could claim to be an independent.  I appreciated the ability to vote for who I considered the best candidate from either party in the primaries.  I think locking someone out of the candidate selection process just because they refuse to affiliate with a party would be wrong.

Now, if you feel that the parties should be able to choose their own candidate without interference, then select the candidate with a convention instead of a primary.  There are serious drawbacks to this method as well, however it would get you what you want.

Me?  I am going to stick with being in favor of open primaries.  I am hoping that by allowing independents to help us pick a candidate, they might be more willing to vote for whichever candidate ends up with the nomination.  This method has its flaws, but it is the better then the alternatives.

As for Ron Paul?  Well I am not saying he should retire, his constituents seem to like him because they keep sending him back.  Well, if that is the way people in his district think, I guess they deserve to have their point of view heard in Congress as well.  I just do not want him to be President, and I do not want to empower his power to express his point of view by falsely inflating his level of national support.  This would be particularly harmful in states like Virginia which still possess the power to be a battleground state in the General Election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I strongly support open primaries.  Yes, they have some drawbacks, however I think the good far outweighs the bad.  It was only within the last few years that I decided I might as well announce party affiliation.  Up till then, I honestly could claim to be an independent.  I appreciated the ability to vote for who I considered the best candidate from either party in the primaries.  I think locking someone out of the candidate selection process just because they refuse to affiliate with a party would be wrong.</p>
<p>Now, if you feel that the parties should be able to choose their own candidate without interference, then select the candidate with a convention instead of a primary.  There are serious drawbacks to this method as well, however it would get you what you want.</p>
<p>Me?  I am going to stick with being in favor of open primaries.  I am hoping that by allowing independents to help us pick a candidate, they might be more willing to vote for whichever candidate ends up with the nomination.  This method has its flaws, but it is the better then the alternatives.</p>
<p>As for Ron Paul?  Well I am not saying he should retire, his constituents seem to like him because they keep sending him back.  Well, if that is the way people in his district think, I guess they deserve to have their point of view heard in Congress as well.  I just do not want him to be President, and I do not want to empower his power to express his point of view by falsely inflating his level of national support.  This would be particularly harmful in states like Virginia which still possess the power to be a battleground state in the General Election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How health reform controls health cost by CPA Promoting Techniques</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2012/01/health-reform-will-control-health-cost/comment-page-1/#comment-15233</link>
		<dc:creator>CPA Promoting Techniques</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 22:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2012/01/health-reform-will-control-health-cost/#comment-15233</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;CPA Promoting Techniques...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]VB Dems &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How health reform controls health cost[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CPA Promoting Techniques&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]VB Dems &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; How health reform controls health cost[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Romney Team-Up? by David Campbell</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2012/02/anti-romney-team-up/comment-page-1/#comment-15219</link>
		<dc:creator>David Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2012/02/anti-romney-team-up/#comment-15219</guid>
		<description>To be clear, I am not advocating this as a Democratic strategy.  I am merely reporting a bizarre attempt by Gingrich and Santorum to stay in the race.  If they want to prolong the nomination battle, spend more Republican money on negative ads against Romney, and weaken Romney in the general election, why should I object?

I am not &quot;encouraging Ron Paul.&quot;  I hope he retires, never to be heard from again.  However, in the unlikely event that he somehow manages to win the Virginia Republican primary, it would certainly be a big black eye for Romney.  Who knows, maybe it would even encourage Paul to run as an independent and split the conservative vote in the general election.

Personally, I am in favor of party registration and closed primaries because I think political parties should get to choose their own candidates without outside interference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be clear, I am not advocating this as a Democratic strategy.  I am merely reporting a bizarre attempt by Gingrich and Santorum to stay in the race.  If they want to prolong the nomination battle, spend more Republican money on negative ads against Romney, and weaken Romney in the general election, why should I object?</p>
<p>I am not &#8220;encouraging Ron Paul.&#8221;  I hope he retires, never to be heard from again.  However, in the unlikely event that he somehow manages to win the Virginia Republican primary, it would certainly be a big black eye for Romney.  Who knows, maybe it would even encourage Paul to run as an independent and split the conservative vote in the general election.</p>
<p>Personally, I am in favor of party registration and closed primaries because I think political parties should get to choose their own candidates without outside interference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Anti-Romney Team-Up? by LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2012/02/anti-romney-team-up/comment-page-1/#comment-15194</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2012/02/anti-romney-team-up/#comment-15194</guid>
		<description>What would we have to gain by encouraging Ron Paul?

I could understand participating in the Republican Party to vote for the most acceptable Republican candidate (because the Republican might win) even if you had already decided you were going to vote for Obama in the General election.  Any other participation only fuels the arguments of those who argue for closed primaries, and closed primaries would not be a favorable outcome.

Besides, Democrats should lead by example.  Just because Rush Limbaugh called for something similar last time around does not justify it.  I would hope we Democrats do not foolishly follow the leadership of Rush Limbaugh; we should know better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would we have to gain by encouraging Ron Paul?</p>
<p>I could understand participating in the Republican Party to vote for the most acceptable Republican candidate (because the Republican might win) even if you had already decided you were going to vote for Obama in the General election.  Any other participation only fuels the arguments of those who argue for closed primaries, and closed primaries would not be a favorable outcome.</p>
<p>Besides, Democrats should lead by example.  Just because Rush Limbaugh called for something similar last time around does not justify it.  I would hope we Democrats do not foolishly follow the leadership of Rush Limbaugh; we should know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Republicans support Romney? by David Campbell</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-15040</link>
		<dc:creator>David Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/#comment-15040</guid>
		<description>Gingrich is almost as much of a flip-flopper as Romney.  Each has past progressive positions that would disqualify them in the Republican primaries.  On the other hand, each is currently taking regressive positions that are unpopular with a majority of the public in the general election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gingrich is almost as much of a flip-flopper as Romney.  Each has past progressive positions that would disqualify them in the Republican primaries.  On the other hand, each is currently taking regressive positions that are unpopular with a majority of the public in the general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bennett v. Villanueva by Frank</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2011/10/bennett-v-villanueva/comment-page-1/#comment-15024</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2011/10/bennett-v-villanueva/#comment-15024</guid>
		<description>Actually, it looks like it turned out just fine!  Now that you have put a loser in as your Vice-Chair, there is no end to the possibilities for your organization.  Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it looks like it turned out just fine!  Now that you have put a loser in as your Vice-Chair, there is no end to the possibilities for your organization.  Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Republicans support Romney? by David Campbell</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-15012</link>
		<dc:creator>David Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/#comment-15012</guid>
		<description>New &lt;a href=&quot;http://dailykos.com/weeklypolling/2012/1/19&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;poll&lt;/a&gt;:
&quot;Mitt Romney has strong principles&quot; &lt;strong&gt;26%&lt;/strong&gt;
&quot;Mitt Romney will say anything he has to to get elected&quot; &lt;strong&gt;61%&lt;/strong&gt;
&quot;Unsure&quot; &lt;strong&gt;12%&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New <a href="http://dailykos.com/weeklypolling/2012/1/19" rel="nofollow">poll</a>:<br />
&#8220;Mitt Romney has strong principles&#8221; <strong>26%</strong><br />
&#8220;Mitt Romney will say anything he has to to get elected&#8221; <strong>61%</strong><br />
&#8220;Unsure&#8221; <strong>12%</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Republicans support Romney? by David Campbell</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-15011</link>
		<dc:creator>David Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 19:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/#comment-15011</guid>
		<description>Agreed.

Gingrich may actually be able to win the nomination as the last anti-Romney left standing.

Paul doesn&#039;t look like he has much of a chance to get the nomination, but will be the only anti-Romney on the Republican primary ballot in Virginia.

If Romney and Gingrich each go into the Republican convention without a majority of delgates, Paul may have enough delegates to play power-broker and decide the outcome.  That would certainly be entertaining!

Alternatively,  Paul may even run as an independent.  He has already announced that he will not run for re-election to Congress.  This is his last shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.</p>
<p>Gingrich may actually be able to win the nomination as the last anti-Romney left standing.</p>
<p>Paul doesn&#8217;t look like he has much of a chance to get the nomination, but will be the only anti-Romney on the Republican primary ballot in Virginia.</p>
<p>If Romney and Gingrich each go into the Republican convention without a majority of delgates, Paul may have enough delegates to play power-broker and decide the outcome.  That would certainly be entertaining!</p>
<p>Alternatively,  Paul may even run as an independent.  He has already announced that he will not run for re-election to Congress.  This is his last shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will Republicans support Romney? by LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/comment-page-1/#comment-14995</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 00:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2011/06/will-republicans-support-romney/#comment-14995</guid>
		<description>The only thing that would be better for President Obama&#039;s chances of winning re-election then Newt Gingrich winning the nomination would be if Ron Paul won it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing that would be better for President Obama&#8217;s chances of winning re-election then Newt Gingrich winning the nomination would be if Ron Paul won it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on No positives with offshore drilling by LittleDavid</title>
		<link>http://vbdems.org/2011/05/no-positives-with-offshore-drilling/comment-page-2/#comment-14994</link>
		<dc:creator>LittleDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vbdems.org/2011/05/no-positives-with-offshore-drilling/#comment-14994</guid>
		<description>The link you provided states that they are mainly talking about subsidies provided in developing and transitional nations, particularly oil exporting nations like Nigeria and Venezuela.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link you provided states that they are mainly talking about subsidies provided in developing and transitional nations, particularly oil exporting nations like Nigeria and Venezuela.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

